Saturday, August 30, 2008

Where Art Thou, American Economy?

In case you've been too busy trying to make ends meet to notice, the American Economy is in the tank. For a sobering look at
  • The Current US Trade Deficit (continually ticking up),
  • Wage Stagnation statistics
  • An economic slideshow of the American Economy (called Charting the Economy)
go to American Economic Alert (this blog title links to it). The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank, reports data showing American workers today have increasing job security (see http://www.heritage.org/), what they don't say is how valuable that job is in today's market. In a June report in USA Today (go to http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-06-08-dream_N.htm) :
"Today's economic malaise caps a prolonged period during which the typical American lost ground.

From the end of the 2001 recession through last year, median household income fell almost every year even as the economy expanded and individual workers became more productive. The most recent official data indicate that in 2006, half of all families made more than $58,407 and half made less. That compares with an inflation-adjusted peak of $59,398 in 2000.

This financial stall marked the first time since World War II that the typical family was worse off at the end of an economic expansion than at the start, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a left-of-center think tank in Washington, D.C.

"This is the first business cycle on record where the median family income failed to recover its previous peak," EPI economist Jared Bernstein says. "It's been a uniquely disappointing cycle from the perspective of the median-income family."

As the report goes on to remind us, this data was before the financial crisis and huge increase in oil prices. It should be no surprise that expensive health care premiums, college tuition rising twice the rate of inflation, and increased food & energy costs add to the mess. The middle class is being squeezed out--some say purposefully, a literal "war on the middle class" (i.e., Lou Dobbs, Thom Hartmann, http://www.tcf.org/list.asp?type=PR&pubid=27).

This attack seems to have been going on since Reagan took office, from the firing of air traffic controllers (reducing union impact), to reduced regulation on banking (resulting in the S&L crisis), to NAFTA/CAFTA, and even more during the Bush Administration (see http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=7638). Reduced taxes to the top 1%, deregulation on banking (again), reduced environmental controls--they're all part of the current admininstration. So, within 3 years of Bush getting into office, the economy reportedly lost 2 million jobs (http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=7639). He revised agreements so that foreign nations did not have to follow US labor protections, he cut worker-training programs, he proposes using "guest workers" (importing workers who get paid lower wages & can also be kicked out of the country at any time), he has harassed labor unions, he also repealed the federal ergonomics standards (as well as other health & safety regulations). This war on labor, when the largest population of workers is the middle class, can hence be construed as a war on the middle class.

What will it take for Middle America to wake up and insist on change?

Friday, August 29, 2008

Palin is not a'biden

McCain has chosen a former beauty queen from Alaska with ties to BIG OIL. Oh boy, just what we need--another Oil person in the White House to give the energy industry (who has spent over $400 million this first 1/2 of the year in advertising & lobbying) more tax breaks! She's anti-choice, pro-drilling in ANWR, pro-death penalty, wants to reduce government regulations, is anti-gay (from http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm) and was probably selected to target Hilary supporters. Those supporters don't know the issues if they think the two women have anything in common. I do like the fact that she has cracked down on corruption during her term as Gov. of Alaska. However, she's under investigation for trying to interfere with the firing of an ex-family member (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/08/palin-mccain-vp.html). You can catch video & other Palin info at http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/08/mccain_introduces_palin_at_day.html; they seem to have picked her back in June. It seems Alaska is also suing the federal government for listing the polar bear as an endangered species. I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that her husband works for BP on Alaska's North Slope? (see http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/sarah_palin/).

From moveon.org (http://pol.moveon.org/emails/palin_announcement.html?rc=homepage):

Who is Sarah Palin? Here's some basic background:

  • She was elected Alaska's governor a little over a year and a half ago. Her previous office was mayor of Wasilla, a small town outside Anchorage. She has no foreign policy experience.1
  • Palin is strongly anti-choice, opposing abortion even in the case of rape or incest.2
  • She supported right-wing extremist Pat Buchanan for president in 2000. 3
  • Palin thinks creationism should be taught in public schools.4
  • She's doesn't think humans are the cause of climate change.5
  • She's solidly in line with John McCain's "Big Oil first" energy policy. She's pushed hard for more oil drilling and says renewables won't be ready for years. She also sued the Bush administration for listing polar bears as an endangered species—she was worried it would interfere with more oil drilling in Alaska.6
  • How closely did John McCain vet this choice? He met Sarah Palin once at a meeting. They spoke a second time, last Sunday, when he called her about being vice-president. Then he offered her the position.7

Sources:

1. "Sarah Palin," Wikipedia, Accessed August 29, 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin

2. "McCain Selects Anti-Choice Sarah Palin as Running Mate," NARAL Pro-Choice America, August 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17515&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=1

3. "Sarah Palin, Buchananite," The Nation, August 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17736&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=2

4. "'Creation science' enters the race," Anchorage Daily News, October 27, 2006
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17737&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=3

5. "Palin buys climate denial PR spin—ignores science," Huffington Post, August 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17517&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=4

6. "McCain VP Pick Completes Shift to Bush Energy Policy," Sierra Club, August 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17518&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=5

"Choice of Palin Promises Failed Energy Policies of the Past," League of Conservation Voters, August 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17519&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=6

"Protecting polar bears gets in way of drilling for oil, says governor," The Times of London, May 23, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=17520&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=7

7 "McCain met Palin once before yesterday," MSNBC, August 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=21119&id=13661-7967348-C6OF55x&t=8

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

The Best of the DNC

Ok, I have picked my favorite speech makers at the DNC (if you missed them, go to their videos at http://gallery1.demconvention.com/ (you might need to install a couple plugins). Click on the Full Schedule & then look for the speaker).
1. Michelle Obama's--such a heartwarming speech and a great speaker.
2. Brian Schweitzer, Gov of Montana--the best Humor of the show & you gotta love that tie.
3. Hillary Clinton--wow. What a great speech for unity.
4. Dennis Kucinich--for a study on American finances & economy (if you weren't scared before, you will be now; I bet he lost 5 pounds giving that speech!).
5. Barack Obama's--a pointed attack at McCain, the current administration, and the Right Wing Talk show hosts.
Now let's take all that energy and get the job done!

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Biden's the Bomb

It was pretty amazing that the Obama Camp was able to keep Joe Biden's selection a secret for as long as they did! I knew the Big O was coming to Springfield to make the announcement; so nice, since he's the IL senator--until Jan. So what does Mr. Biden bring to the ticket? (Go here for more http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/23/AR2008082300890.html?hpid=topnews). During the Presidential debates, I was quite impressed with his oratory and international knowledge, both of which our nation is in desperate need. He's been in the Senate since '72 and is Chair of the Foreign Relations Committee. He's not afraid to speak out & challenge misconceptions with cold, hard facts--MSNBC has an exerpt from a June 22nd Meet the Press discussion at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26010055/?GT1=43001. (You can also check out key issues at http://biden.senate.gov/issues/).

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Political Fact Checking

So, be sure to check out my favorite websites to the far right (you might need to scroll down). I refer to these often when checking for sources of information. I've just added Factcheck.org (click on the title of this blog to go to it), which is a non-partisan site created by the Univ. of PA Annenberg Public Policy Center. They're currently running info on the latest political ads coming from both Obama & McCain.

On another note, watch out for new laws or attempted new laws on voter registration fraud. Despite the fact that there has been very little individual voter fraud in the US, Republicans are latching on to the idea of requiring a valid driver's license before you can vote. No biggee, you think, right? Well, did you know that there may be as many as 21 million voting-age Americans who don't have a driver's license? In Indiana alone, 13% of registered voters "lack the documents needed to obtain state identification." (see http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/24/toobin-voter-id/). Students trying to vote near campus will be unable to do so because their college ID cards aren't eligible. A study done 2 years ago by John Lott Jr (see http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=925611) seems to suggest otherwise. When I did a Google search, it seems most fraud was done by groups (ACORN, county clerks, Republican staffers, etc.). It seems ironic that, up until the last election, no one really bothered that much about it because a large percentage of Americans weren't voting. (see http://www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/toptable/tab6a_2.htm). For instance, in '04, 23% failed to vote; in '02 38%. In 1990, 1994 & 1998, over 40% of Americans didn't bother to vote. For more interested details on American's and their voting habits, go to http://www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/gd-index.htm#6. (ANES is the American National Election Studies research database of election tools.). You can review some interesting tables at the Census Bureau, too (http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/voting/cps2006.html). Anyway, it seems to me that, with more registered voters (and more Americans vote Democratic than Republican), the goal should be to help, not hinder, the election. After all, politics has become such a dirty word you'd think our "fearless leaders" would try to do something to clean it up.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Fact or Fiction: Lies & Exaggerations in Books

When I attended school & college, I learned that when writing, "facts" were substantiated with real proof and "fiction" was hearsay or made up. It seems authors and editors are having a hard time recognizing the difference, and the public is being misled. Remember James Frey and Oprah? (go to http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0104061jamesfrey1.html if you've forgotten). Or the woman claiming to be a holocaust victim who lived with wolves? (see it at http://forums.buddytv.com/lost-off-topic/65709-author-lies-about-being-holocaust-survivor-living-wolves.html) So here comes a "non-fiction" (defined at http://www.allwords.com/word-non-fiction.html, among other places on the web) book that, due to bulk ordering, will automatically be placed on the NYTimes #1 bestseller list. Ok, you didn't know that the bestseller list is based on the number of books ordered, not the number of books sold to consumers? Yet, even before it hits the stacks, it's already been vetted to be inaccurate (http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/search_results?qstring=corsi). On top of that, the author contradicts his own book. I'm referring to Jerome Corsi, also infamous for his attacks on Kerry in '04. In his own words, “‘The goal is to defeat Obama,’ Mr. Corsi said in a telephone interview. ‘I don’t want Obama to be in office.’” I hope Borders & B&N place the book firmly in the Fiction Section and consumers, instead of buying the book, read what they need in their in-store cafes. It apparently isn't worth the paper it's written on.

Monday, August 11, 2008

Share your Energy Ideas w/EDF

The Environmental Defense Fund is running a blog for folks to share their ideas on saving energy. Check it out & add your ideas at http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/greenroom/2008/08/08/oil-change-share-your-ideas/. And, don't forget to check out The Story of Stuff at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9153550196656656736. It might open your eyes.

Saturday, August 09, 2008

Energized

Some energy stats:
a. 96% of the world's transportation energy currently supplied by oil.
b. $75= Cost of barrel of oil on July 18th, 2007.
c. $131= Cost of barrel of oil on July 18th, 2008.
d. 9.6 billion= Number of fewer miles Americans drove in May 2008 compared to May 2007.
e. 10.3 billion= Number of trips taken via the U.S. public transportation system in 2007, the highest in 50 years.
f. 44%= Percent increase in price of diesel fuel paid by public transit agencies.
g. 20% of America's public transit agencies that are cutting services due to budget constraints.
h. $6251= Amount the average two-worker household saves annually by taking public transportation instead of driving a car.
i. 2030= Year by which lifting the ban on offshore drilling may start to impact the price of gas.

Sources:
Let's take a look at what we have:
1. According to the DOE, one of the nation's biggest oil & gas producing areas is what they call the Appalachian & Illinois Basins. (http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/Basin_Analyses/AIBasin_061906.pdf)
This includes 10 states (KY, PA, MD, NY, OH, VA,WV, TN,IL & IN). They estimate 4.8 BBbl of oil & 79-96 Tcf (Trillion cubic feet) of natural gas. American currently uses about almost 20 MBl of oil per day. Assuming it could all be extracted in one day (& their own estimates put it at 2030), that would be about a year's supply.
2. The DOE shows (http://www.spr.doe.gov/dir/dir.html) 283.5 MBls of sweet crude in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It's the world's largest emergency reserve & can only be released during a national emergency by the President. At our current national usage, this reserve is about 14 days of supply.
3. Go to http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/pdfs/41869.pdf for an exhaustive report on Wind Energy. Using 2006 prices, it looks like it costs about .01/kWh (I think the average electricity rate is .10/kWh. However, the report notes that wind energy prices have gone up due to the following: shortages of wind turbines & components due to high demand, a weak US dollar vs the Euro (many major components are imported from Europe) and a big rise in material costs (steel, copper & transport fuels).
4. Three types of Solar energies can be found at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/: Concentrating solar power, Photovoltaics, & solar heating. Solar energy currently accounts for less than 0.1 percent of the electricity generated in the US (go to http://www.motherearthnews.com/Renewable-Energy/Solar-Power-Potential.aspx ). It could grow to 10% by 2025. Of course, electric companies need to take advantage of this technology. The creation of PV's has a toxic waste byproduct called silicon tetrachloride, though this waste can be recycled (see http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9889848-54.html). It's interesting that the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) has put a moratorium on solar projects (see http://www.enn.com/energy/article/37536) but not on fossil fuels.
5. For a report on Hydrogen Fuel Cells, go to http://www.doe.gov/energysources/hydrogen.htm. Taxpayers are already fronting a $1.2 billion commitment to hydrogen. Lots of stumbling blocks remain & full commercialization isn't planned until 2020 & mainly for the transportation sector. Even the DOE recommends, in the short run, purchasing a hybrid.
6. The DOE discusses nuclear energy at http://www.doe.gov/energysources/nuclear.htm. The big stumbling block continues to be safety--immediate on-site and long term regarding spent fuel rods. The government is currently trying to reduce "regulatory & institutional barriers" to building new nuclear plants for one reason--to not rely solely on natural gas. Go to http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html to learn about Three Mile Island and to http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.html for info on Chernobyl.
7. Alternatives include Geothermal, Hydropower, Bioenergy & Coal. More on these next time.

A Disappointment of Character

It is so disappointing to hear about John Edwards, that he lied about having an affair, however brief. Lying to everyone about it is simply out of character, from all that I've read. Elizabeth Edwards had to fight this disappointment as well as cancer; what a trooper. He can, of course, kiss his political career goodbye. It's also appalling to think they both thought they could keep it hidden & run for President. Is this worse than John McCain divorcing his first wife because she became disfigured after an auto accident? I'm chewing on that one.

Friday, August 08, 2008

McCain Attacks!

So McCain goes on the attack--again. This latest salvo ("Why doesn't Congress get back to Washington to work on an answer to the energy problem?") is political grandstanding once again. What he doesn't tell you is that the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, filibustered three energy bills & is holding out for off-shore drilling (go to http://www.kentucky.com/591/story/481454.html for more on this). Then go to https://pol.moveon.org/donate/gettowork.html?r=4015&id=13424-7967348-YLNK56x to see just how hard McCain has worked on energy policies.
In the meantime, it has just been discovered that McCain has received suspicious & potentially illegal campaign contributions, many of which stem from oil executives. Go to http://pol.moveon.org/mccain_oil_donors/?r_by=13441-7967348-RVqd8dx&rc=paste for more on this.
Now, face it. I think every Congressperson has, at some time or another, taken BIG OIL money. So, here's a website where you can see who, how much, etc. http://prezoilmoney.oilchangeusa.org/index.php. I'm sure that, given the amount of money the oil companies have now, we'll see much more pour into election coffers. (You know they're not trying to invest in refineries or alternate fuel--most of their profits are going into buying back their own stock to help keep the value up). Now, if you go to http://opensecrets.org/pres08/select.php?cycle=2008, you'll see that Hillary Clinton actually is slightly ahead of McCain. Of the 12 or so Presidential Candidates (both sides of the fence), Hillary & McCain together pulled in more oil money than the other 10 combined.
And, because I enjoy a good laugh, I just had to add Paris Hilton's Campaign Ad (go to http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/64ad536a6d).

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Political Rhetoric & Senior Moments

If you are politically aware, you realize that campaign ads are nothing more than political rhetoric. Sometimes, however, what you don't know is that the producers of them also stretch the truth or outright lie. And those lies are never forced to be retracted. In many instances, corporate media won't cover it either. So how do you know what's going on?
1. Realize that politcal ads are just that--a marketing tool to sell you something.
2. Find viable sources to help you decide a candidates position (start with the party platform, then the candidate's own websites). BTW: Wikipedia is not a viable source.
3. Ignore the polls. Remember, 32% of statistics are wrong (according to Marty Triola). Polls can be easily misdirected, from only using specific area codes to the wording of the questions.
4. Realize that most of today's "mainstream media" is corporately owned. (Go to http://cjrarchives.org/issues/2005/5/editorial.asp, http://cjrarchives.org/issues/2003/6/comment.asp, http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html and http://www.mediachannel.org/news/indepth/fcc/. It's thus in the interest of about 10 media companies to stifle stories not in its best interest. These media giants also send big, fat campaign checks to Pro Big Business candidates.

So, especially if you live in a "key state"--those considered a battleground (http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/whos-ahead/key-states/map.html)--you'll see dozens of misleading ads or political statements that are nothing more than rhetoric. My fave right now is McCain's remark asking Obama to urge Congress back into session over the Energy issue. He makes it sound like something BO can do & that it's unusual for Congress to be out of session. However, doesn't everyone know that Congress always takes a summer break? Also, since McCain has been in the Senate for about 20 odd years, why didn't they do it before? Come on, gimme a break.

Also, if you didn't know it before, maybe you will now. McCain definitely has his "senior moments." Now, I don't mean to be ageist (after all, I'm moving in that direction myself!), but check out the 3 different camera angles--esp. the 3rd one--showing McCain's befuddled face this week. Go to Brave New Films (the title of this blog links directly to them) and watch this short video:http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/39179-mccain-s-youtube-problem-just-became-a-nightmare (cut/paste this link if the main link doesn't work). You can see, in John McCain's own words, his confused & often opposite stand on various issues over the last few years. We need a clear head in the White House, not someone verging on Alzheimer's!