Just the Facts, ma'm

I have been accused of using only liberal or biased sources in this blog. I obviously take exception to that & try to find "valid" sources. Perhaps there's a difference in what one considers "liberal" and "valid"? Occasionally, I admit, I do veer off course--usually because I find the item humorous or that particular "liberal" source had the most well-written article and I didn't think I could do better. If you dig down, you'll note that I use government sources, non-partisan or at least bipartisan sources, Scientific American, Pew, The Economist, etc. Sometimes I read a research paper & note that it contains info similar to another source that is easier to read (if you've ever wafted through research & scientific journals, you'll understand!). I have found that many "conservative" sources are biased as well--so it's a struggle to sift through the flack.

Enough said. Last night's 2nd Prez Debate appears to have been a snoozer (I can't say, since I worked right through it). The header above links directly to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/debate_fact_check, so don't slam the receiver. I'm just passing it on. I think it's pulled from FactCheck.org, which I think is extremely non-partisan.